Blind Faith
I’m a Boomer, and if I
were Jewish, I’d have celebrated my Bar Mitzvah the same year Canada celebrated
it’s Centennial. I have a Centennial one dollar bill from that year, no serial
number, just 1867-1967 and the stylized Centennial maple leaf. But this column
isn’t about money, it’s about Faith. I don’t have any.
That’s not strictly
true; I have faith the sun will rise in the morning, I have faith tomorrow will
be another day, unsullied by regret and remorse, I have faith spring will follow
winter, leading to sailing season. But I don’t have Capital “F” Faith.
Religion. Spirituality even, nada, de rien, bupkis.
The whole idea that we
should organize our lives around the primitive origin myths of an obscure
desert tribe is puzzling to me. The Roman Pantheon makes more logical sense as
a metaphor for our existence, the Greek gods of Olympus even more so, with
their petty jealousies and eternal squabbles.
Truth be told, if they
had the box on the census form, I’d check “Pagan”. A tree is a miracle worthy
of worship, imaginary beings aren’t. Being a Pagan means honouring the Earth
and all its creatures and things. You can honour an apple by eating it, same
with a chicken. You can honour a tree by cutting and using it to make things
and provide heat, but you honour nothing by cutting every tree in the forest.
That’s the kind of fuzzy, non-linear thinking I use to explain my moral choices
to myself. That’s Pagan.
I know a columnist in
England, a High Tory as Blue as they bleed, who calls himself, rather than a
conservative, a ‘situationist’, and I appreciate the rubbery flexibility of
this notion. Judgments are made based upon the facts of the situation at hand,
moral choices to follow. Except it still begs the question of what choice to
make when the situation offers nothing but bad choices.
This is where most
people need faith; faith that they’ll get through this despite the odds. A
Pagan doesn’t question fate, just tries to learn how cruel it will be. Pagans
don’t pray for assistance, they accept fate, well, fatalistically..
This is where both
morality and mortality come together. Someone who makes his or her choices
without any expectation of reward is more likely to face their end with
equanimity, secure in the knowledge life was well-lived in the now, not spent on the
afterlife. Pardon the excursion into cheap philosophy.
Polls tell us more
people consider themselves ‘spiritual’ nowadays than describe themselves as
‘religious’. The difference seems to be not having to go to church, and
attendance is at historic lows. This isn’t a Boomer phenomenon, but it is our
reality too. Our parents were the last religious generation. I don’t know
anyone who attends church or could be called religious. My late brother-in-law
was a devout Catholic, but he was the rarity, not only among our family, but
among his own.
Friends of mine will
gather at the Solstice to greet the rising sun, and Yuletide is always
celebrated by everybody, regardless of faith, with pagan abandon. But not much
God is involved, thank you. God’s gotten a bad name lately, with crazy
preachers calling for mayhem in his name, but that’s what you get when you let
an imaginary deity dictate your moral choices to you; there’s no one there to take
responsibility.
In his novel Cat’s
Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut (the Boomer Shakespeare) described the religion of
Bokonon, which is based on the idea the deity doesn’t care about you, so you
might as well do the right thing on your own. If everyone did this, used their
own good judgment to make their most important life choices, instead of relying
on ancient moral codes or bearded
invisible friends, wouldn’t we be happier with the results, knowing we had only
ourselves to blame?
No comments:
Post a Comment