Shafted
I’m a Boomer, born the
same year as the Voting Rights Act, which finally conferred democracy on
American blacks nearly a century after the Emancipation. I cherish democracy,
being born white and male in North America in the middle of the 20th century, I
think of it as my right. Of course, it isn’t. Most of the world’s population
doesn’t have my ability to cast a free vote.
And I vote. In every
election, municipal, provincial, federal, at my yacht club and in the Oscar™
pool. I’ve never missed a vote I’ve been eligible for since I cast my first
vote in 1972 for Pierre Trudeau. Voting is made so easy in Canada, you’d think
everyone would do it; no line-ups, nearby polling stations, friendly
scrutineers, no purple ink and machine guns. But they don’t. Vote, I mean. The
turnout in the last federal election, one many people thought of as the most
critical in decades, was just over 60%. Voting has been heading south from 70%
since 1988 in this country. Of course, turnout is even more anaemic for
provincial and municipal elections.
I think of one’s vote as
one’s own business. The only time I ever tried to influence someone’s vote was
when a Jewish friend of mine was going to unwittingly vote for a fundamentalist
Christian who had made distinctly anti-semitic remarks before he got involved
in politics. That’s the power of your vote, you can use it as a needle or a
bludgeon. However, some things are just so unjust that they demand communal
electoral action, and they demand getting involved.
Federal Industry
Minister James Moore made some comments last week which got a lot of press. He
said “We have never been wealthier as a country than we are right now. Never
been wealthier….is it my job to feed my neighbour’s child? I don’t think so”.
The second half of that
comment got all the attention, and Moore was forced to apologize for it, which
he did, handsomely. But the first half of the statement betrays a callousness born
of ideology and privilege.
The same week, Federal
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was rubbishing the genuine concerns of retirees,
voters, business leaders, academics, pension experts, union leaders and
economists who all agreed that the Canada Pension Plan needed expanding if the
next generation wasn’t going to age in poverty. He claimed the economy was too
fragile to support CPP enhancement now, that increased contributions would be
job-killers, that it might be attempted in “three, five or eight years” if
things improved. He then doubled down by saying he wouldn’t support any action
that far in the future.
Well, which is it? Are
we wealthier than we’ve ever been yet unable to care for our senior citizens?
Are we so desperately impoverished that future generations of retirees will
move to North Korea for the standard of living?
Both sets of comments
were an outrage, and demonstrated how completely out of touch a government I
used to grudgingly admire for its consistency and messaging had become from its
own citizens.
CPP expansion is not a
matter of “Is it a good idea?”, it’s far more a matter of “do it now or risk a
generation of poverty”, Canadians are no less frugal than other nationalities,
yet we can’t save for retirement on a normal middle-class income. And the
number making a middle-class income is shrinking, so the number unable to save
will grow.
The answer in my
universe is a Guaranteed Annual Minimum Income, to replace all social supports,
including pensions, welfare, disability, social assistance, etc. Roll it all
into a minimum annual income of $20,000 per adult, and allow people to make
their own choices. Just the savings in administration would go a long way to
funding the plan.
This isn’t socialism,
it’s pure profit-sharing. We own this country, and if it’s “wealthier than it’s
ever been”, that’s because of us, and our productivity and sweat. And we
deserve to share in the wealth we’ve created. We all should, actually, but if
we have to start somewhere, let’s start with retirees. I’ll cast my vote for
that.
No comments:
Post a Comment